Home Editorial Balance Battlefield 3 Beta Impressions 2: Tastefully tactical

While my last Battlefield 3 impressions article may have been peppered with complaints about the system by which the beta itself runs, make no mistake: I’m enjoying it heartily.

Yes, Origin is clunky and the beta is full of delightful little bugs, but so is a can of month old tuna, and you don’t see me turning that away, either. Indeed, BF3 has so far shown itself to be not only satisfying on a visceral level, but a carefully crafted stage of virtual violence. For as many things are there are to whine about, DICE has preemptively silenced complaints with gameplay that puts strategy first.

Lights, lasers, action

There is no doubt in my mind that anyone playing Battlefield 3 will immediately be struck by its graphical power. Yes, some textures are muddy and models simplistic, but DICE has already confirmed that’s a beta-only problem. No, fair reader, I’m talking about the lighting.

Fire, sunlight, and explosions are all fairly typical light sources in the FPS genre. Occasionally, muzzle flares or flashbang grenades are sprinkled into the mix. But even the most cursory of gameplay experiences in the BF3 beta reveal just how big a difference a well-orchestrated visual orgy can make. Yes, the sun shines and dark corridors are brilliantly illuminated by gunfire, but there’s so much more.

The delicate, shifting shadows of the underbrush everywhere. Was that an enemy crawling by, or the wind? Firing into the shrubs may net you a kill, or may reveal your location to a separate, unimagined foe. The smarter, more patient player capable of exploiting these intricate details is usually the victor.

And while lighting plays tricks on you in some areas, it’s also a weapon. No, your assault rifle’s mounted flashlight isn’t anything that’s going to make Alan Wake jealous, but in Battlefield 3 that doesn’t mean it isn’t lethal. Turn the corner with your high beams on and any enemies looking in your direction will be all but blinded. But leave it on unnecessarily and they’ll see you coming from a mile away. And while this is an obvious tradeoff, the game is full of interesting dilemmas posed by more than just the free flow of photons.


Decisions, decisions

In a few months post release, I’m sure analysts will have determined the optimal weapons and the optimal routes through each map, but at least in the beta, it doesn’t feel like there’s a “best” solution to any given situation. For every tactics there is a counter tactic. For every weapon, a different strategy. Here are some of the most interesting examples I’ve stumbled upon so far:

  • Lying prone enhances aim and decreases your profile, but at the expense of reduced spatial awareness and maneuverability
  • Using a laser sight increases accuracy, but a laser on an enemy’s face will be visible to him, giving your intentions away
  • A melee kill is a guaranteed, 1-hit victory dance, but the animation is drawn out and the knife unsheathing sound is audible
  • Frontal assault paths are direct and include cover, but are obvious – side paths are roundabout and bare, but harder to cover
  • Being behind cover shields you from danger, but explosives.

While these examples are not hugely exciting on paper, they’re constantly coming up in actual gameplay. In the final version of Battlefield 3, these considerations will be amplified by the existence of vehicles. Do you take the jet knowing it can do moderate damage in your hands, or hope your next teammate is an ace pilot? Do you push forward as an Engineer repairing tanks, or do you suit up with smoke grenades and lay down a wall of concealment? Many of us face choices like this in our daily lives, and seeing them played out online is highly rewarding.


My only weakness is bullets

Of course, a lot more has changed since Battlefield Bad Company 2 and the introduction of prone. Many aspects of gameplay have been tweaked to make the experience more fluid, intuitive, and fair.

  • If you spawn on a crouching or prone squadmate, you will appear in the same state as him/her. Bad Company 2 players tired of being revealed by standing squads materializing in their otherwise hidden location, rejoice
  • The Assault class is now in charge of healing, giving them something to do other than endlessly spam grenades
  • When being revived, the dead player now has the option to refuse the revive, preventing trolls from forcing their comrades back to life into a suicidal situation
  • Kill assist points are now directly related to how much damage the assistant did to the target
  • M-COM stations can only be destroyed by being manually armed, so no more C4/mines/tanks/UAV bullshit tactics

In addition to these types of tweaks, the gameplay itself and scoring systems have been changed to encourage (gasp!) teamwork. Players now earn points for staying alive long enough for teammate to spawn on them. Additional points are offered for providing suppressive fire. In other words, players now have a reason to help their teammates make it down a hall alive. Suppressive fire also causes enemy vision to blur, giving it an actual function akin to scaring the shit out of one’s foes.

Weapons, in general, do massive damage. Almost every gun kills in a single headshot, and the rest will do someone in in fewer than five bullets. While some people are whining the skill has been removed from the game since a couple stray bullets can now be completely fatal, these people are morons. High damage results in not only more “realistic” gameplay, but also means players must be more strategic in their approach to the objective. Run-and-gun tactics simply don’t work, but teamwork does. A squad that employs a mix of suppressive fire, blinding light sources, obfuscating smoke, and well-placed grenades will go quite far. And that’s without the use of tanks!


The big payoff

The end result of this carefully balanced system of scoring, measures, and countermeasures, is that winning feels rewarding. You didn’t lose because an enemy got a lucky crit or a bullshit killstreak bonus. You lost because you weren’t listening to the rustling behind you and the unsheathing knife headed for your throat. You didn’t win because you memorized spawn locations or you have the best power-ups. You won because you and your squad approached the objectives carefully, backing each other up and carefully balancing pressure with safety.

Throw in a few of the archetypal “Battlefield moments” the series is known for, and all of a sudden you have something instantly memorable – even if your memory is you staring at your own corpse. There’s just a little time left in the beta, so what are you waiting for? We need to collect your dogtags soldiers like you on the frontline!

Advertise with Top Tier Tactics

18 replies to this post
  1. “Using a laser sight increases accuracy, but a laser on an enemy’s face will be visible to him, giving your intentions away”

    How’s that? Does it flash up like you actually had a laser pointed at your eyes?

    All that makes it seem worth a buy simply because of the lighting, but again, PC…I hate this thing.

    • Yes, if there’s a laser aimed at your face, you’ll see the same kind of annoying red flickering on your screen that you see in real life. It can be switched on/off easily.

      Most of the lighting effects are spectacular. Rifle scopes glint in sunlight, flashlights are blinding, and smoke is utterly convincing. Flashlights should probably be toned down in broad daylight, but other than that it all feels quite fair.

      Of course, it also looked astounding.

  2. I was really enjoying the beta on the 360, but I’m pathetically low on hard drive space and had to delete it for the Portal 2 DLC.

    Maybe that’s a sign it’s time to upgrade.

    Nah, it’s probably just a sign I can delete the AC:B DLC in preparation for AC:R, right?

  3. Can anyone comment on the difference between the PC and PS3/XBOX360 versions of BF3?

    I gave up on high-graphics gaming on PC quite a while ago…

    • Shooters on any console that is not PC sucks.
      No offense to your choice, but that’s a definition.

      I think you could compare it with TF2 in terms of console vs PC.

      But I do agree, console gaming is like PvP in WoW.
      It’s not all that expensive once you got into it, there’s a nice community, some might do both PvE and PvP, but there’s no real comparison between it except for that PvP is a little worse, especially for PvEers.
      You also notice that you’re playing a style that is no longer or not yet the common.

      Man, that comparison is grand!

    • For a more serious list of actual differences:

      -PC will have higher graphics capabilities, while consoles will be running on the rough equivalent of “medium” settings.
      -PC will have a significantly higher player count in all modes
      -PC will have control options: mouse & keyboard, controller, joystick. Console will have only controller support

      Major disadvantage:
      -PC players will have to use EA Origin

      • Battlefield is a flight game for a certain percentage of the time, and many BF players have kept a joystick on their desks for better heli/jet control.

      • That would be nice. Can you configure the game to switch from keyboard and mouse to the joystick when you enter the cockpit?

      • You can bind any controls to any device. So if you only bind vehicle controls to the joystick/controller, it will only function with vehicles. I personally plan to play with a wired 360 pad hooked up, I’m not bad with helicopters.

  4. The reason I gave up on PC was because of the continued need to update hardware in order to catch up with new game requirements. As a result, I now no longer play ANY FPS because I still can’t hack playing on a console without a mouse and keyboard. That said, if more games follow the CS:GO idea of allowing KB/M support I MAY change my stance on console FPS.

    • Not that good. I have a 4 year old PC with a medium-ish video card. It can barely run TF2 but I can run BF3 (beta) at 30-50 FPS no problem on mid-high settings.

      • How good does it run TF2. For example, I get about 30fps on Chris’ maxframes config on 640x480p, lol. Would you think I could run bf3 with an fps config after it comes out? I know its asking a bit much, but your story inspired me. :D

Leave a Reply

Newest Articles

Disciple of the Ring
8 5184

Since I began playing Magic: the Gathering nearly 20 years ago, I've been drawn to blue/red decks. Maybe it's just that I've always favored instants...